Analyzing the multiculturalism crisis in light of the systematic sociological theory

  • Raisa E. Barash Institute of Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences raisabarash@gmail.com
How to Cite
Barash R.E. Analyzing the multiculturalism crisis in light of the systematic sociological theory. Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal = Sociological Journal. 2016. Vol. 22. No. 2. P. С. 31-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2016.22.2.4256

Abstract

The author examines the European “multicultural fiasco” from the point of view of the systematic sociological theory. Appealing to such aspects of the sociological system theory as “self-description”, “differentiation” and “double contingency” allows explaining the underlying reasons for the intercultural dialogue fiasco, and the tragic manifestations ofEurope’s unsuccessful "wide open arms" attitude. Referring to the works of T. Parsons and N. Luhmann, the author suggests viewingEurope’s attempt to build a multicultural community as self-differentiating subsystems adjusting to one another, and also ponders to what extent the need to build a multicast society lead to the host community facing a self-description crisis. Examining European multiculturalism development’s long term background brings the author to the conclusion that one-sided self-differentiation on behalf of the host majority, given the situation when they are prepared for internal changes under the influence of increasing external diversity and minorities tending to be communicatively isolated, is insufficient for stable internal communications among European societies’ social systems. Also, the failure of European multiculturalism reflects the failed policy of unilateral self-differentiation, which inEuropewas accompanied by the host European culture’s crisis of self-description. The system theory somewhat successfully shows that the multicultural fiasco is in fact the failure of the double contingency between the host majority and the “guests”.While pondering alternatives for multiculturalism, the author notes that many European researchers sympathize with the concept of interculturalism (based on its "dialogical nature"). However, when analyzing Canadian experience in intercultural coexistence, the author concludes that, despite success in North America, the interculturalism strategy is not ideal for Europe. The author concludes that a more informative way to evaluate cross-cultural interaction strategies would be from a communication study standpoint — analyzing the successful establishment of communication and systems of self-description used by those who represent various communities.
Keywords:
multiculturalism, interculturalism, communication, differentiation, self-description, double contingency, systematic sociological theory

Author Biography

Raisa E. Barash, Institute of Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Candidate of Political Sciences, Senior Research Fellow

References

Antonovskii A.Yu. Niklas Luman. Epistemologicheskoe vvedenie v teoriyu sotsial'nykh sistem. [Niklas Luhmann. Epistemological introduction to the theory of social systems.] Moscow: IF RAN, 2007. 135 p. (In Russ.)



Eagleton T. The idea of culture. [Russ. ed.: Iglton T. Ideya kul'tury. Transl. from Engl. by I. Kushnareva. Moscow: HSE Publishing House, 2012. 192 p.]



Krizis mul'tikul'turalizma i problemy natsional'noi politiki. [Crisis of multiculturalism and problems of national policy.] Ed. by M.B. Pogrebinskiy, A.K. Tolpygo. Moscow: Ves' mir Publ., 2013. 400 p.



Kukathas Ch. The liberal archipelago. A theory of diversity and freedom. [Russ. ed.: Kukatas Ch. Liberal'nyi arkhipelag. Teoriya raznoobraziya i svobody. Transl. from Engl. by N. Edel'man; Ed. by A.V. Kuryaev. Moscow: Mysl' Publ., 2011. 482 p. ]



Kukatas Ch. Teoreticheskie osnovy mul'tikul'turalizma. [Theoretical Foundations of Multiculturalism.] Polit.ru [online]. Accessed 05.09.2015. URL: . (In Russ.)



Kukatas Ch. Terpet' neterpimoe [Tolerating the intolerable.]. Polit.ru [online]. Accessed 05.09.2015. URL: . (In Russ.)



Luhmann N. Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Kapitel 4: Differenzierung. Kapitel 5: Selbstbeschreibungen. [Russ. ed.: Luman N. Obshchestvo obshchestva. Differentsiatsiya. Samoopisaniya. Transl. from Germ. Vol. 2. Moscow: URSS Publ., 2011. 640 p.]



Luhmann N. Soziale Systeme: Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. [Russ. ed.: Luman N. Sotsial'nye sistemy. Ocherk obshchei teorii. Transl. from Germ. by I.D. Gaziev; Ed. by N.A. Golovin. St Petersburg: Nauka Publ., 2007. 648 p.]



Luhmann N. Baecker D. Einführung in die Systemtheorie. [Russ. ed.: Luman N., Bekker D. Vvedenie v sistemnuyu teoriyu.; Transl. from Germ. by K. Timofeev. Moscow: Logos Publ., 2007. 360 p.]



Luhmann N. Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Kapitel 5: Selbstbeschreibungen. [Russ. ed.: Luman N. Samoopisaniya. Transl. from Germ. by A. Antonovskii, B. Skuratov, K. Timofeeva. Moscow: Logos Publ., ITDGK “Gnozis” Publ., 2010. 320 p.]



Luhmann N. Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Kapitel 2: Kommunikationsmedien. [Luman N. Obshchestvo obshchestva. Chast' II. Media kommunikatsii. Transl. from Germ. by A. Glukhov, O. Nikiforov. Moscow: Logos Publ., 2005. 280 p.]



Parsons T. The Structure of social action. [Russ. ed.: O strukture sotsial'nogo deistviya. Transl. from Engl.; Ed. by V.F. Chesnokova, S.A. Belanovskiy. Moscow: Akademicheskii Proekt Publ., 2000. 880 p.]



Walzer M. On toleration. Castle Lectures in ethics, politics and economics. [Russ. ed.: Uoltser M. O terpimosti. Transl. from Engl. by I. Myurnberg; Ed. by M.A. Abramov. Moscow: Dom intellektual'noi knigi Publ., 2000. 160 p.]



Huntington S. Who are we? The challenges to America's national identity. [Russ. ed.: Khantington S. Kto my? Vyzovy amerikanskoi natsional'noi identichnosti. Transl. from Engl. by A. Bashkirov. Moscow: ACT Publ., 2004. 635 p.]



Alibhai-Brown Y. Beyond multiculturalism. Canadian Diversity/Diversité Canadienne. 2004. No. 3 (2). P. 51–54.



Baecker D. The meaning of culture. Thesis Eleven. 1997. No. 51. P. 37–52.



Barry B. Culture and equality: An Egalitarian critique of multiculturalism. Cambridge: Polity Press Publ., 2001. 416 p.



Cameron rebukes Farage over ‘fifth column’ Charlie Hebdo comments. The Guardian [online]. Date of access 05.09.2015. URL: .



Community cohesion: A Report of the independent review team chaired by Ted Cantle. The Guardian [online]. Date of access 05.09.2015. URL: .



Declaration on Intercultural dialogue and conflict prevention. Council of Europe [online]. Date of access 05.09.2015. URL: .



Donati P. A multicultural society needs a relational reason. Acta Philosophica. 2013. No. 22. P. 349–360 [online]. Date of access 05.09.2015. URL: .



Elliott F., Waterfield B. May gets tough over fate of Med migrants. The Times [online]. Date of access 05.09.2015. URL: .



Farage on Friday: Why multiculturalism has failed Britain, France and every other country. Express.co.uk. [online]. Date of access 05.09.2015. URL: .



Gagnon A.G., Iacovino R. Federalism, citizenship and Quebec: Debating multinationalism. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007. 217 p.



Grenda C.S., Beneke C. When Blasphemy Goes Viral. The 'Charlie Hebdo' massacre marks the dawn of a digital age of irreverence and retaliation. January 16, 2015. New Republic [online]. Date of access 05.09.2015. URL: .



Habermas J. Struggles for recognition in the democratic constitutional state. Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition. Ed. by Ch. Taylor, A. Gutmann. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1994. 175 p.



Hartman G. The fateful question of culture. New York: Columbia University Press, 1997. 250 p.



Joppke C. Minority Rights for Immigrants? Multiculturalism versus antidiscrimination. Israel Law Review. 2010. No. 43 (1). P. 49–66.



Joppke C. The retreat of multiculturalism in the liberal state: Theory and policy. British Journal of Sociology. 2004. Vol. 55. No. 2. P. 237–257. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2004.00017.x



Kittel B. Die Selbstbeschreibung der Gesellschaft. Der Begriff der Nation als missing link der Systemtheorie? IHS-Forschungsberichte, Reihe Politikwissenschaft. 1993. No. 4 [online]. Date of access 05.09.2015. URL: .



Kymlicka W. Defending diversity in an Era of Populism: Multiculturalism and interculturalism compared. Date of access 05.09.2015. URL: < http://www.academia.edu/11038453/Defending_Diversity_in_an_Era_of_Populism_Multiculturalism_and_Interculturalism_Compared_2015_>.



Meer N., Modood T. How does interculturalism contrast with multiculturalism?. Journal of Intercultural Studies. 2012. No. 33. P. 175–196. DOI: 10.1080/07256868.2011.618266



Merkel erklärt Multikulti-Konzept in Integration für tot. Reuters [online]. Date of access 05.09.2015. URL: .



Modood T. Multiculturalism, Interculturalisms and the Majority. Journal of Moral Education. 2004. Vol. 43. No. 3. P. 308.



Modood T. How Easy Is It To ‘Be British’? Interview With Tariq Modood. Studies in Ethnicity and Nathionalism [online]. Date of access 05.09.2015. URL: .



Modood T. Mutliculturalism is not dead in the UK. The success of Muslim groups proves that multiculturalism is thriving, says Tariq Madood. The Guardian. October 6, 2010 [online]. Date of access 05.09.2015. URL: .



Modood T. Still not easy being British: Struggles for a multicultural citizenship. L.: Trentham Books, 2010. 164 p.



Multiculturalism doesn't work in France, says Sarkozy. RFI [online]. Date of access 05.09.2015. URL: .



Parsons T. Comparative studies and evolutionary change. Comparative Methods in Sociology: Essays on Trends and Applications. Ed. by I. Vallier. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971. P. 97–139.



PM's speech at Munich Security Conference. February 5, 2011. GOV.UK [online]. Date of access 05.09.2015. URL: .



Politt K. Republicanism vs Multiculturalism in France. The country struggles with religion and integration one week after the Charlie Hebdo murders. January 21, 2015. The Nation [online]. Date of access 05.09.2015. URL: .



Stevenson G. Building nations from diversity: Canadian and American experience compared. Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queens University Press, 2014. 324 p.



Taylor Ch. Multiculturalism and “The politics of recognition”. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1992. 192 p.



UKIP's Nigel Farage: Multiculturalism “The Biggest Mistake The Governments Have Made”. Real Clear Politics [online]. Date of access 05.09.2015. URL: .



Walzer M. Comment. Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition. Ed. by Ch. Taylor, A. Gutmann. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1994. 175 p.



Yahya M. What does the Charlie Hebdo attack mean for Europe? January 15, 2015. Carnegie endowment for International Peace [online]. Date of access 05.09.2015. URL: .
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

ACM
[1]
Barash, R.E. 2016. Analyzing the multiculturalism crisis in light of the systematic sociological theory. Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal = Sociological Journal. 22, 2 (Jun. 2016), С. 31-54. DOI:https://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2016.22.2.4256.
Section
THEORY AND METHODOLOGY